- Al Gore
- I didn't vote in the 2000 election, either, because I was on my mission. I didn't know anything about the issues, and the only thing I knew about Gore was that he was the robot that invented the Internet.
- The Environment
- I'm down with the environment.
- Environmentalists
- I think they're wackos that are so fanatic about the environment that they fail to see the solution to their own issues. (Just for the record, that's also what I think of most libertarians.)
- Global Warming
- I haven't been convinced if it is a real thing or not. I realize that they've been doing research on the issue for a lot of years, but even if they'd been doing it for one hundred years (which they haven't been), I don't think that's anywhere near the data that they'd need to make a claim that the Earth's temperature were rising (anymore than it would normally, as part of the Earth's natural cycles), let alone that we as humans have anything to do the rising.
For me the most impressive piece of evidence was the core samples. At first, Gore just showed the graph of the data that they'd been collecting since the late 50's. I'd seen that before, and I wasn't impressed. It definitely shows that the carbon levels and the temperature are increasing, but so what? That's not sufficient to show that it's not a natural cycle. Then I learned that they have been taking samples of the ice in glaciers and in Antarctica, and that they can see what the temperature and carbon levels were up to 650,000 years ago. Over that time you can see the past seven ice ages, and you can see the Earth's natural temperature (and related carbon) cycle. Then you can see that within the last 100 years we've doubled the carbon levels over what they've been any time in the Earth's history. You can see that the increase is exponential, and doesn't fit into the cycle at all.
I can't detail everything that the movie talked about, but just what impressed me about it. One of the things that I felt after the movie was just that I was sad that I hadn't known about any of this sooner. I don't think this is new evidence, but just that it hasn't been made publicly available. Or at least it hasn't been in front of my face before. I guess if I'd cared about the issue I could have looked into it on my own and probably found some of this out, but realistically, what incentive could I have had to look into it on my own? Why would I research it personally if I hadn't ever been convinced that it was an issue that I should be concerned about it? And how many people are like me, in that they would care about the environment if they were convinced that it were in danger, but simply haven't seen any evidence? And how many of those will continue that way despite this movie? Would I have continued in my ignorance if I hadn't been dating Kelly? Do we choose to stay ignorant because we don't know any better, based on the limited evidence we've seen, or do we do it knowingly? Are we close-minded because of political prejudices, or just because it's scary to think that we've done this and that it'll be hard to fix?
The other thing that I realized, besides simply that global warming is actually occurring, is that it is occurring now. This isn't a problem that our children's children will have to face, it's a problem that is already killing people. I'm sure not everyone thinks about things the same way as I do, but I've certainly noticed the increase in natural disaster that's happened in my lifetime. I've considered it as part of the signs of the times, and fulfillment of revelation. It never occurred to me at all that we were causing these things because we have been altering the climate of our planet. I wonder how many religious people are like me, and recognize the signs without recognizing the causes.